This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:     2529
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:     3641

Total number of variables............................:      445
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:      388
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:      675
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:      515
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:      160

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0  1.0503586e+02 3.76e+00 1.00e+02 2.61e+02  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1  1.0504064e+02 3.76e+00 1.48e+00 2.86e+00  -1.0     -   1.00e-07  1  2h
   2  1.8809694e+02 3.74e+00 7.70e-01 1.49e+00  -1.0     -   5.21e-03  4  1h
   3  4.3218536e+02 3.70e+00 6.18e-03 8.65e-03  -1.0     -   1.15e-02  3  1h
   4  4.1624408e+03 3.04e+00 4.87e-03 8.26e-03  -1.0   -4.0  1.78e-01  1  1h
   5  4.2100104e+03 3.03e+00 5.14e-03 8.15e-03  -1.0     -   2.35e-03 10  1h
   6  2.9738137e+04 4.53e+00 4.01e-02 8.14e-03  -1.0     -   7.86e-01 10  1H
   7  3.1936164e+04 3.40e+00 1.98e-02 3.87e-03  -1.0     -   2.81e-01 10  1h
   8  3.4600017e+04 1.80e+00 7.48e-03 1.05e-03  -1.0     -   4.75e-01 10  1h
   9  3.6761208e+04 5.13e-01 1.86e-03 8.91e-06  -1.0   -4.5  7.22e-01  1  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10  3.7596100e+04 3.79e-03 1.55e-04 4.55e-06  -1.7     -   1.00e+00 10  1h
  11  3.7591493e+04 2.69e-03 8.77e-04 7.50e-06  -3.8     -   7.44e-01  4  1h
  12  3.7589557e+04 9.21e-04 5.69e-03 5.17e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  4  1h
  13  3.7589390e+04 1.52e-05 8.80e-06 3.92e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  14  3.7589338e+04 2.85e-07 4.28e-04 1.65e-06  -8.6     -   9.98e-01  3  1h
  15  3.7589334e+04 8.87e-12 1.35e-04 6.22e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h
  16  3.7589330e+04 7.46e-14 3.18e-05 1.39e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1f
  17  3.7589330e+04 5.68e-14 4.13e-06 3.28e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1f
  18  3.7589330e+04 8.53e-14 4.42e-06 7.93e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1f
  19  3.7589330e+04 2.49e-14 2.58e-12 3.03e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  3  1h

Number of Iterations....: 19

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:   1.0107653184240980e+03    3.7589330200802098e+04
Dual infeasibility......:   2.5792701308091637e-12    9.5920422729989257e-11
Constraint violation....:   2.4868995751603507e-14    2.4868995751603507e-14
Complementarity.........:   8.1486886615898606e-11    3.0304141151340346e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   3.0304141151340346e-09    3.0304141151340346e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 22
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 20
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 22
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 20
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 19
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 21
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 113

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.025 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.100 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.030 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.070 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.225 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).